Awesome.Pherephassa Is Not Amused

I’m hyped for Everquest: Next, and Everquest Next: Landmark. Every time a new video or livestream goes up, I run around in excited little circles at the thought of possible new info. It’s a pattern I’ve been through countless times before, and one that many people have seen. I’d actually thought that I was beyond such excitement, I’ve been burned so many times by games that surely I’m a jaded old gamer by now. But EQN and EQNL bring a new level of creativity to the mix of MMOs that just gets me going every time I think about them.

So when I sat down last night to watch the livestream, it was with vast amounts of enthusiasm. Today they were talking about harvesting! Woohoo! I expected that there’d be things about the system that I wouldn’t enjoy, that comes with all games. What I didn’t expect was to have my excitement cut so badly that I nearly walked away from the computer midway through the stream and feeling remorse at having purchased the Trailblazer Pack.

But before I go into what announcement caused that negative a response, let me go over some of the cooler things that this livestream revealed. Terry Michaels, Senior Producer, Collette Murphy, Community Manager, and Emily Taylor, Producer sat down last night to share a few more details with their fanbase.

Mining. For the very first time, we got to see mining in action! And holy tamoles did it look cool. It was like Terraria digging thrown onto a chocolate sundae and decked out with the works. The entire terrain is actually the ores you’ll harvest, and you can actually see the different types of rocks and veins when they are encountered on the surface. I watched as the miner ran over the mountain until she spotted a silvery patch and then started swinging. As she dug, the ground tunneled out, and she was able to follow the ore vein down into the ground. Just like in Terraria, you can clearly just find a random spot and start digging. Don’t want to go over the mountain? Just go through it! What fun! The system currently has land healing at a ratio of about 20 minutes, although they were sure to state that they are still playing with this number. And fear not – there is no such thing as node camping because the ore that grows back will be random.

We also got to see a little bit about itemization, they showed a picture of two different picks with different stats. We learned that crafting isn’t the same grind to level, buy/learn recipe, grind to level again system, that recipes would be randomly found throughout the world. The bonus stats on gear are randomly generated, which I loved, and one of the stats was ‘discovery’ which increased the likelihood of finding bonus items like recipes or more/better ores while harvesting. I am definitely going to spend vast amounts of time mining my way deep into the earth, in search of adventure, recipes, and raw materials. One of the very cool “stats’ mentioned was pick size. I don’t mean the physical size of the object, but the area the pick will excavate. Want to clear a large area? Or carve a smaller, more accurate path? Yup, there’s a stat for that.

I was concerned by the confirmation that there is no item durability. In order to have a healthy economy that allows crafters to actually sell their goods, there must be something that removes items from the world on a scale that’s comparable to how many items are being introduced. “But I don’t want to lose the sword I worked so hard to obtain” is the usual response to the concept of item decay – but I wonder if that’s not due to the way that items are generally treated. They represent status, accomplishment, skill. But what if the reward from that big uber boss isn’t a shiny powerful sword, but a title? Or a pet? Mount? Cosmetic item? What if items are simply tools, to be used and replaced, with no “status” attached to them other than the very basic tier they’re in?

I’m very much looking forward to seeing what systems the devs have in place to tackle this issue. They seemed to have some system in place that wasn’t being discussed, I’m hoping it’s as creative and interesting as everything else about this game.

If you’re still reading, you’re probably wondering what it was that upset me so much, if I am this enthusiastic about everything else that was said about the game. And that would be – naming. Yup, the old chestnut regarding naming conventions. With a worldhopping game like EQNL, there’s been a lot of calling from players on using a system that allows for people to have the same name, so we can have the glorious pleasure of encountering a thousand Drizzts, Legolases, Wolverines, Katnisses…

[warning, entering rant mode]

But let me explain the naming convention before I move into my full, irritated rant. You see the title above? Awesome.Pherephassa? Yup, that’s the solution. Everyone will choose a unique name, for their entire account. Then each character will have a character name, and the end result will be a name that looks something like Awesome.Pherephassa. Your unique name appears on every character, attached to the character name after a period. So in the case of Awesome.Pherephassa, Pherephassa is my account name, and Awesome is my character name, and everyone sees Awesome.Pherephassa.

Yes, I am repeating it more times than is necessary, because it annoys me so much and I want to emphasize just how ridiculous it looks. Awesome.Pherephassa is not a name. It’s a bit of code, or a formatting error. It’s not something I can look at and use to identify with my character, it’s not something to give my character personality, it’s an abomination that absolutely destroys my ability to have privacy – because anyone who knows my unique account name will be able to identify any of my alts that they encounter in the world, just by looking at my name. And it looks awful, to boot.

Hooray! Now instead of a mad name rush for character names, we can have a mad name rush for account names! Who here isn’t likely to pick the real name you want as your account name, and just use an adjective of some kind as the character name? I can’t possibly take this naming system seriously, so I am likely to have my characters all named things like:


And that’s assuming I even play enough to have alts. Account names always limit my interest in a game, as sometimes I do like to hide somewhere and harvest, and having a way for someone to identify me defeats that.

Here’s to hoping that they will clarify this system further, and that it’s not really as bad as it sounded last night.

About Pherephassa 213 Articles
Pherephassa has been creeping around the etherspace long enough to have remorted so often that not even she can recall her original form. She loves sandboxes, challenges, chain mail bikinis and dungeons so large they take weeks, months or even years to fully explore. Currently seeking an MMO home, she can often be found on the side of the road, begging game designers for death penalties and slow leveling curves.


  1. Well. I can’t disagree with the analysis of using account names in character names (though I’m not sure it’s as bad as you think) but the Name.Account is at worst a formatting issue.

    It’s trivial to change the display in code to “Name Account” so it looks like a proper firstname surname. Which won’t stop people using adjectives and, really, doesn’t do anything complementary for the sort of account name I typically end up having to use. I hate seeing people running around named _xXGrOoV3_M4StErXx_ and sadly I expect I’ll see a lot more of that.

    Maybe they should consider tacking a character’s primary (or original, or whatever) server name. IE Pherephassa of Aerie Peak (yes, I just grabbed a random WoW server name, time for a shame snack). It’s got a much better ring to it. Though in the freeform server context characters might not have a ‘home’ server. I dunno. At any rate, it would provide a way to compartmentalize names so you could have a dozen Drizzts and still tell them apart. No, wait, I don’t want a dozen Drizzts. Damn. To be fair, I don’t want a Dri(12 zs)t either so you sort of pick your poison. :(

  2. I’m really hoping that I’ll end up having to write a recant, because I misunderstood what they were trying to say.

  3. Pretty sure you’ll get your chance to write that recant — Theres so many people working on the game that one of thems bound to have a moment of clarity and think “erm guys are you sure about this”.


    Personally I quite like the convention of first and last name & try to keep it in keeping with the setting. Although Delve your “Xaras of Darkmoone Faire” ( again from WoW…… I really wanted to try one of Delves shame snacks — they sound tasty!) actually seems pretty cool Id be pretty happy with that.

  4. @Xaras Yeah, though there is a world of difference between a character first name and surname and … whatever this is. SWTOR’s legacy system annoyed me, because I really don’t like the idea of having to come up with one name that is applied across all my characters, but at least there I had the choice of how to display it. I could display it as a surname, a prefix, or a title. It wasn’t attached to my name in a way that doesn’t even try to look like a name.

Comments are closed.